8/21/2019 Omorashi Diaper Mess
Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your people.
lol[edit]
Should the link Diaper Fetishism be deleted as it redirects back to Diaper Lover?
I do not believe so, no. Diaper Fetish is a very common term describing Diaper Lovers. It appears the only time that a diaper is viewed as a fetish item is shunned upon, is for infantalism, in a way to avoid conflicts with pedophilia.
I believe we need a new image for this page, and the current image should be moved to the latex fetish page. Most DL's enjoy images of women in normal white disposable or cloth diapers, and the image of the 'pvc diaper' probably appeals more to the latex crowd.
I agree
External Links[edit]
The following can be found at Wikipedia:External links:
What should be linked to
What should not be linked to
Thus I've removed a few links. If you want to add them back in, please refer to the above (or note other applicable guideline pages) in discussions here first.brenneman(t)(c) 04:03, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
Moved here:
brenneman(t)(c) 00:02, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Adult Sites[edit]
I wanted to address a point of contention. Firstly, when I changed Brenneman's comments, they weren't intended to vandalize the page. Sorry about that. The first deletion was a mistake. I wasn't trying to remove it. The second was what I intended to do: Change it to make it more accurate. Again, sorry for the confusion. DPF first of all is an adult site. 'people' is an all encompassing term meaing adults, teens, children, etc. I realize it's nit-picky but taking the infantilism page and this page here at Wikipedia into account, both basically state that the paraphilia can be discovered in adolescence and even childhood coupled with the fact that more and more kids are getting online, it's probably a good idea to make the distinction particulary clear. Those sites are fine and dandy for adults but not for youngsters. --preceding unsigned comment by68.81.106.187 (talk • contribs)
Unsourced Material[edit]
I've copied here the material that was unsourced/unreferenced.
If you want this material is to be re-inserted, please discuss it here.
brenneman(t)(c) 04:17, 18 July 2005 (UTC) Simple answer. Wiki is open sourced and information is added by people who know about a subject. Thus, community trust is needed and people who know something about this subject edit it in constructive ways and makes sure it is not incorrect. Citing all the sources would make wiki a place for elite experts and not every day users. Also, all the rules are guidelines, not rules for exsistance. The article just wont be a featured article, but it still has worth. I am reverting the article and asking Inter to step in again. --OrbitOne 11:51, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
I have sourced this article up the wazoo, so I'm going to take the tag down now. Fsecret 02:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
In my effort to fill out this article and get a lot of good citations in here, I have a misplaced fact that needs sourcing. I'm referring to the information in the psychology section about the latency period. It might have been in the 'Understanding Infantilism' article or something similar, but I've done so much searching and added so much info here that now I can't find the page. Anyone who wants to help whip this article into shape could start reading through the various psychology pages that pop up on google to source the statement and expand the section. Thanks. Fsecret 03:00, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
In light of the ridiculous arguments it may fuel, it might be better to find a new way to phrase that. Even so, I say we keep it for now. Even the paraphilc infantilism page definitely defines the term in the first sentence of the article by saying that diapers are the main focus of the ageplay going on there. However, now that I look at it, that page is a complete mess. It goes on later to state that only one in three infantilists claims a diaper fetish ... not even a majority by a longshot! This is not reflected by any Adult Baby community I have ever seen or heard of. Diapers are indisputably the central focus of the sexual gratification happening there. It also seems like they are having some sort of debate over whether or not infantilism is even a sexual fetish, even though it is clearly categorized as one on Wikipedia. I am going to stay out of that one. What we need to focus on is cleaning up this page where we can actually get something done. Fsecret 00:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
The statistic regarding the amount of DLs who are also ABs has been removed for the time being. Apparently the original form in which it appeared (which at first seemed to have been be mistyped) was actually not mistyped. Apparently, 66.6% of adult babies do not want to be identified as having a sexual fetish of any kind, for ageplay or their diapers. As I have said above, this is an argument that needs to stay off of this page, since this page is about diaper fetishism. If anyone can find a real statistic regarding how many admitted diaper fetishists will also admit a fetish for infantile ageplay, I think that it can keep this page from becoming a big mess again. Fsecret 01:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Move to Diaper fetishism[edit]
Also, might it not be better to move this page to 'diaper fetishism?' It seems like a more encyclopedic title, and none of the other pages in the fetish category are listed by what the participants are commonly called. For instance, paraphilic infantilism is not called 'Adult Baby' and the wet and messy page is not called 'Sploosh.' Any arguments for or against the move can go here. I say we give the matter two weeks to be discussed and come to a decision about the move. Fsecret 00:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Agreed, BitterGrey. Perhaps you could be in charge of writing something to that effect to be included on the page after the move?Fsecret 03:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Sexual fetishism generally means arousal from the object, and is not specific to the 'who' and the 'where' of it. The rest is really just a matter of personal taste. And as far as I know, the 'diaper lover' term arose in common use over the internet in order to describe someone who took part in diaper play. Slang generally does not recieve an offical definition unless it has been adopted by a dictionary. However, I agree that a moved article would have to include information regarding those who like to wear diapers for comfort rather than fetishism.Fsecret 03:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, it looks like the final tally comes to one vote of support and two votes of neutral. As such, the article will be moved. Fsecret 23:36, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Panalphilia?[edit]
A [Google search] for 'panalphilia' only gives two references to Wikipedia. Where else is this term used? BitterGrey 04:11, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Our visions for the Diaper Lover article[edit]
Might it be worthwhile for us to discuss what we would like the Diaper Lover article to become, as well as how it relates to the sister article on paraphilic infantilism? BitterGrey 05:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Moving forward[edit]
Despite my reverts, I actually think some bits and pieces of the material Fsecret added could be re-worked into something useable. I'll work on some ideas, but for now I'll start with something simple, and hopefully un-controversial:
I propose adding the following to the 'See also' section:
I'm on the fence about omorashi, as the only common factor appears to be urination, which is already covered by urolagnia. For similar reasons I didn't include ageplay, since the connection is only through infantilism.
Any objections/comments? Anonymous55 21:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Omorashi[edit]
BTW, does anyone know if omorashi is even for real? I never heard of it before yesterday, and the article seems to have been written single-handedly by Fsecret. Anonymous55 21:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
Check the outside links. Omorashi is a type of erotica in which women experiance bathroom desperation and wet themselves, usually in their panties, sometimes in a diaper. The game shows and the erotic (though admitedly, only erotic to someone turned on by girls wetting themselves) videos are produced by the same handful of companies for the same fanbase: people who enjoy seeing girls try to hold it and fail. A quick visit to Giga or Sanwa should statisfy anyone who is sceptical about the existance of omorashi. There are also some fetish glossaries here that define it.
I added the reference on the diaper lover page because omutsu omorashi is the Japanese equivalent of diaper fetishish. What is interesting about it is that unlike in english speaking countries, their diaper lover community is not associated with their adult baby community. (Which, FYI, is called Aka-chan.) Certainly notable on the diaper lover page, in my opinion.
As for the info I added, I am glad that Anonymous55 has gone on record to say that there were ideas there that might be fitted into the article. I will tread a little lighter next time, and perhaps these contributions can be worked in without so much fuss. Sorry for rushing in like that. I didn't mean to step on anyone's toes. Fsecret 23:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Oh, by the way, if checking for relevence to omorashi, Sanwa primarily focuses on diaper content, where Giga has more of the little 'I-have-to-pee-but-can't-make-it' dramas. Fsecret 23:49, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
I have copied and pasted the omorashi discussion to the appropriate talk page. Fsecret 23:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, first of all I suppose I should address my use of the term erotica vs. pornography. Pornography generally implies nudity or sex. Omorashi activity never involves sex and rarely involves any nudity at all. Someone totally unacquainted with the idea might watch an omorashi video and not see anything sexual about it. However, for an omorashi fetishist, seeing a girl have a bathroom accident is very erotic. Without actual sex to worry about, the omorashi fetish videos provided by companies like Giga and Sanwa range from documentary (video of a fetish convention where girls are wetting their pants or having diapers changed) to dramatic (a staged scenario with actors and a script which ends in a girl wetting herself) to game shows (like Giga's Desperation Tournament.) It is hard to call a gameshow pornography when we generally associate the term with people who get off from watching actual sex. However, Giga and companies like it market all of these side by side as 'omorashi.' Even if one cannot read Japanese, it is easy to verify this by looking at the page that you described as looking like 'a page of pornographic video covers.' Most of these videos have the word OMORASHI printed in roman letters on the front. As for the translation, what can I say? Google has yet to perfect the automatic translator. You could ask it to show you the original page, but then it would be in all Japanese. By the way, anyone wanting to view the main sight can scroll to the bottom of the page and click 'TOP PAGE,' clearly printed in English. This will take you away from the omorashi page to the main page, where you can see Giga's other 'erotic-but-not-necessarily-pornographic' movies.
The 'prostitution' you refer to is probably the omorashi service at an 'image club' or 'pink salon.' Prostitution is illegal in Japan, though the only thing the Japanese government defines as such is genital-to-genital contact. Pink Salons are establishments that have in the past specialized in oral sex, but these days have gradually added a number of other 'not-quite-sex' services. They are a place where one can go to receive a massage plus oral sex or a range of other fetish oriented services that are not sex, but are as good as sex to a fetishist. Image clubs offer an extensive range of fantasy services that include costumes and settings. An omorashi service can involve either the client, the masseuse, or both, wetting themselves, with or without a diaper. This can sometimes involved a 'teiku auto' or 'take out' where you get to take home your masseuse's wet panties or diaper, or just their urine in a bottle.
Omorashi is more than a 'genre of pornography.' It is a highly developed Japanese fetish subculture that, though it does not involve sex or even in most cases nudity, is catered to by the purveyors of adult entertainment in that country.
By the way, the Sanwa link that you said looks like an adult content warning is. Click on the button in the middle of the page and you will go into the site and onto a page that says 'omorashi web club.' That much is in English. Not much else on the site is, but there will be one of a few randomly assorted welcome pictures of a girl in wet panties or a diaper that anyone can understand.
Omorashi is a fetish thing. Anyone who would describe themselves as an omorashi fan will tell you that seeing a girl wet herself in a diaper gets them off. This is not always true of those who identify as 'AB/DL.' I think it would benefit both this page and the paraphilc infantilism page to find a statistic regarding exactly how many 'AB/DLs' do not regard what they do as sexual.
Anyhow, those who identify as diaper fetishists and would agree that seeing a girl wet herself in a diaper is erotic for them. They would probably regard diaper-wearing omorashi fans as fellow diaper lovers. Fsecret 02:57, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Anonymous55 - I think you need to lighten up. By all means explore the definitions, and try to learn and understand more, but don't berate contributors and abusively refuse to look at information they provide because of some pre-existing personal moral crusade of yours.
Omorashi is for real, and the fact that you had not heard of it before, or that one person took it upon himself to write an article, is irrelevant. What the word actually means I can't say, but the 'fetish' (for want of a better word) of wetting oneself, or liking to see others wet themselves, is very real, and is certainly not confined to Japan. I could point you at a number of US and UK websites that deal with the topic, but you'd probably refuse to look at them too.
As far as I know there is no English word for it, other than the simple descriptive 'wetting' or 'desperation', i.e. there is no equivalent of urolagnia or urophagia, but again that doesn't make it any less real. It's all part of the spectrum of 'pee-play', but there are people who although they enjoy wetting would not want to be urinated on, or to drink urine.Wetmikep 02:30, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Just for the record, that guy posted on the portion of this discussion I posted on the omorashi article. I copied it here to keep the thread from devloping down two seperate paths of discussion. Despite the fact that Wetmikep took it upon himself to come to my defense, I do not want to be associated with any personal attacks made by him. As for the accuasation 'sock-puppetry,' that also borders on a personal attack. I do not appreciate people starting rumors like that when I am already trying to juggle those 'real-life pressures' you mentioned and (pretty much) single handedly create the omorashi article. That kind of nonsense undermines wikipedia. Please consider that such remarks could dissuade many people from joining in on the article and providing a fair and unbiased view of the issue. Bittergrey, your insights about the misleading nature of exported porn are right on the money. I hope you wouldn't mind if I copied and pasted the comment into the omorashi talk? I really don't want to make waves or offend anyone. Fsecret 15:54, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Also, I would like to say to Anonymous55 that I completely understood and respected his point on the stigmas already attached to infantilism. As you saw, I didn't really have anything to say to that - I didnt reply. That thread sat there for a long time. What I mean to say is that if I had a problem with your approach I would have said something. I've never been shy about doing so before. I do not consider you a moral crusader. You make good points. Fsecret 18:34, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Oh, and to answer your question on the difference between omorashi and urolagnia, Bittergrey, the distinction is that omorashi refers to people who are into full bladder desperation and the accidental emptying of their bladders while clothed. Urolagnia refers to people who are into peeing in general, usually during sex, on eachother. Fsecret 19:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Psychology[edit]
I have added a psychology section with references to two articles from medical journals. Help from anyone who wants to help build this section would be welcome. Fsecret 03:13, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, Malitz's article states that the boy in question developed the paraphilia when he was a young child, then repressed the memory, which 'did not recur until puberty whensexual desires were intensifying [...] at 13 or 14.' In Dr. Pate's article, she reports that 'his wish to be a baby began at approximately age 12, when puberty must have been approaching. We can speculate that one of the determinants of the adult baby syndrome in this case may have been a wish to avoid the threat of genital sexuality by regressing to an infantile dependent state.' We might want to use these quotes in the article in order to more clearly show how they might compare with freud's own theorys regarding fixation.Fsecret 01:26, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Merging with Paraphilic Infantilism[edit]
It has suggested that this article be merged with paraphilic infantilism[16]. What are people's views on this?
I did remove the merge tag, but then reverted my own edit when I realized how recent this discussion was. I'll give this a least couple more days before deleting it again. --Umalee 22:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
I would ask you not to delete the merge tag no matter how many days have passed. Both articles are quite long and a merge would take time. Consider that the references to this article use the term infantilism in their title, and several do not use the term diaper lover. Given this a merge to the term preferred by the citations seems like a proposal that should stand.Lotusduck 01:17, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
This is a silly argument. It is a clear fact that diaper use in fetishism is not exclusive to infantilists. One could just as easily suggest a merger to TPE, BDSM, omorashi or rubber fetishism. The entire problem with this article is that too many of its sources draw from material on infantilism. To suggest that it should therefore be merged is circular logic. Fsecret 03:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
This discussion has not seen any new developements in nearly two months. Since it began, many important changes have been made to the Diaper fetishism article which completely rule out any rational argument for a merger. If no one feels the need to pursue the matter any further, I think we should give it until June 1st, then consider this discussion closed, archive it, and remove the tag. Fsecret 22:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I dont think anyone is trying to contend that paraphilic infantilim is the same thing as diaper fetishism though. In fact, one of the important distinctions the paraphilic infantilim page makes is that it is not nessisarily even a fetish. Several of the souces cited portray it instead as a paraphila. The use of diapers in fetishism is very clearly a seperate issue; key sources on the infantilism page state that fewer than 50% of infantilists identify as diaper fetishists.
From a purely editorial standpoint, it is illogical to merge down a broader article to a more specific one. Not only would this be in opposition to wikipedia's stylistic guidelines in general, but also of the policy of avoiding lengthy articles. Fsecret 19:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I would like to point out, BitterGrey, that though all sexual fetishes are paraphilias, not all paraphilias are sexual fetishes. BeckyAnne's sentiment is a good example of why it wouldn't be right to lump the entire infantilist community with an article about the fetishish community at large. Fsecret 21:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Vote: Neutral. In reading the two articles I find that there is a subtle difference between a Diaper Lover and an Adult Baby (In My Opinion). It seems that the use of a diaper as a paraphilia is more focused on the physical applications. In contrast the Adult Baby view is more the use of the diaper as an aid to the psychological applications. In essence the two camps of thought are extremely related to each other and yet miles apart. It is possible for an Adult Baby to use a diaper in the physical terms of a Diaper Lover (Sexual erotica) and possible for a Diaper Lover to indulge in Baby Play (Again in my opinion). This does not preclude that the Diaper Lover article immediately references Adult Babies without defining the term Diaper Lover first. So it's association with the Adult Baby article is already established in the first paragraph. Perhaps a re-wording where the reference to Adult Babies (infantilism) is a simple section explaining the relationship between the two and the rest of the article could assume a more detached view. I do feel it is appropriate to have two articles but I don't feel the current article for Diaper Lovers currently stands on it's own yet. I do have to say though I liked how the Diaper Lover article makes several references to other related paraphilia and sexual interests like Urolagnia and Omorashi.
A suggestion is the the term Diaper Lover be more referenced (link to) the Adult Baby article and in the section explaining the DL term have that reference a diaper fetish or diaper paraphilia. -- Sukima 18:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Preferences in Diaper Fetishism[edit]
I think that this article might be improved by condensing/rewording/making more encyclopedic some of the details in the 'Aspects of the Fetish' which deal with preference into a sectioned called 'Preferences in Diaper Fetishism.' It might look something like this:
'Like many fetishes, personal preference plays a large role in which communities the fetishist will identify with. In diaper fetishism, one of the primary divisions of preference is whether or not the diapers are used for their intended purpose, and if so, to what degree.
Many diaper lovers gain arousal from 'wetting' or urinating in their diapers. A smaller number[1] gain the same arousal from using the diaper to 'mess' or defecate. Some fetishists do not use their diapers at all. They may find such practices unappealing or they might not want to deal with the cleanup. Others may become aroused by wearing in public; still others prefer the security of wearing only in private.
Many diaper lovers choose to wear in both public and private, using their diapers as intended and never visiting the toilet. Though for a large group this embodies the full spirit of the fetish, others have found that their enjoyment of wearing diapers diminishes rapidly when the need to wear diapers is always present.[27]
Another preference might be cloth or disposable. Disposables have become increasingly popular in recent years due better availability and ease of clean-up, but many diaper lovers who were babies in the era of washable cloth diapers tend to prefer washables as adults.[28]'
Does anyone else think this would be a good idea?Fsecret 01:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
References
Deletions[edit]
There is only one section in this article that needs to mention infantilism, and that is the section about the differences between it and diaper fetishism. Fsecret 04:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Autonephioplia[edit]
I think this is a more accurate term, but I don't see it used anywhere on Wikipedia.http://www.forensicpsychiatry.ca/paraphilia/overview.htm—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Timocrates (talk • contribs) 14:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC).
'Fetish Subcultures?'[edit]
This article should use the term 'fetish' narrowly, as the APA does. The American Psychiatric Association, in the DSM, groups fetishism as #302.81 (pg 569 in 4th TR), while masochism and infantilism are #302.83 (pg 572 in 4th TR). Paraphilic infantilism and diaper fetishism might be discussed as two aspects of the same continuum; paraphilias (#302) that involve diapers. This is true in some senses. It could also be written that they are separate, which is also true in some senses. (This is why the APA gave them separate terms and numbers.) However, it cannot be properly written that paraphilic infantilism and BDSM are subgroups/subcultures of fetishism. Many misuse 'fetish' to mean 'paraphilia,' a much broader category including fetishes and many non-fetishes. This is a misuse in that it is not consistent with the APA's definition of fetishism. BitterGrey 06:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)strong desire to wear or use diapers without physiological necessity.
I am a lover[edit]
Am I the only one on this discussion that likes diapers? I just wanted to know that or not. Anyway, I see there is only one picture in the article, are we planning on getting more?
Biased images?[edit]
Why is it that, even though infantilism/diaper fetishism is supposedly more common amongst males than females [30], that all the images on this page feature women and no men? This to me seems biased and in violation of WP:NPOV, catering to what straight male AB/DLs want to see, rather than an accurate reflection of the paraphilia. Not to mention the fact that the image seems to portray infantilism more than diaper fetishism, and therefore isn't relevant to this page. What do other people think? Coop41 (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Sources, reliabel or otherwise[edit]
I have concerns about some of the sources used in this article.
Barring substantative support that these are reliable I'll be removing them in a few days.
brenneman 06:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Recent deletions[edit]
For those wondering, WLU's involvement with this page is an extension of a series of edits that also includes paraphilic infantilism[32], adult diaper[33], and infantilism[34]. The disruptive intent of these edits is clear. For example, he altered the article to refer readers to an entire chapter of the DSM (47 pages)[35], when only a subsection (4 pages) was relevant, _after_ the counterproductivity of the same change was discussed at paraphilic infantilism. I had to fix WLU's mess there [36] and now had to fix it here too[37]. BitterGrey (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
DLs are not associated with ABs directly[edit]
As a DL and incontinent person I dont think we Ds immediately associate ourselves with ABsI'm incontinent and wear Tena Slip Maxi (talk) 10:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Huh?[edit]
The article first says that DF doesn't involve sex, then it say that it's involved in sexual masochism. FuFoFuEd (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
Coprophilia and urophilia[edit]
These are linked in the see also section. Are they really things related to diaper fetishism? I don't think diaper lovers are any more likely to have those than anyone else. I think they are no more related to this topic than pedophilia is. 209.86.226.56 (talk) 05:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diaper fetishism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
As of February 2018, 'External links modified' talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the 'External links modified' sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template
{{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).
Cheers.--InternetArchiveBot(Report bug) 05:12, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Diaper_fetishism&oldid=882908851'
Forgot SomethingSternenschauer241
Mature content
Ryuko MatopeemayIhelpyouriff70Satsuki KirurinemayIhelpyouriff40
Amnesia Suppository
ALL CHARACTERS OVER 18 hypno177245LoliDenthypno1773330
Bob's elder sister, Nicole, was an attractive 20-year-old teenager. She liked to party, spend time with her peers and make laugh of her brother. He annoyed her, was unruly and mean. To make matters worse, boy started to have the first sexual fantasies! Nicole never caught him but was pretty sure that her brother was the reason she were losing so many bras and strings. She tried to tolerate it but one time it was too much. She had a funny birthmark on her breast and she was really ashamed of that. But one day her brother were peeping her in the shower -- What the hell are you doing, Bob? Enough is enough! This time I'm gonna tell parents everything! -- Will you tell them about this funny thing on your tits too? Oh, they already know... But your boyfriend doesn't, does he? -- You... How dare you... -- So shall I tell him? He'll find himself another girlfriend then! -- What do you want? -- Oh, nothing special... I just wanna your laptop... mine is million years old.
[CRITIQUE REQUESTED] Dememorized
Bob was 18 yo boy. Last Thursday he went back from school at 12, much earlier than usually. He was surprised by a car parked in the front of his house. He knew his father had to go on the business trip for a few days but he expected that the mum was inside. He rang the bell but no one went. He remembered he had his own keys in rucksack so quickly opened the door and went into home. Where was mum? She didn't sit in a living room. Bob decided to go to her bedroom. When he was next to the door he heard strange moans. He opened and saw his own mother kissing passionately with a stranger. She had only panties on herself! It took a few seconds before the couple noticed Bob. The woman screamed when she saw the boy. hypno1772017Coffee, Tea, or Pee? Qatar AirwaysRerwin180
-- Bob? - she asked - what are you... --Mom? ... What are you...? What will dad say... The woman was a bit scared but quickly concentrated. She knew what she had to do. --Bob... I'll explain it... - she whispered. She slowly walked to the cupboard and grabbed a bottle and lyi
Luke The Hedgehog, The Series Ep. 2
Episode 2: Sophia's Bathroom Problem sonicluke12220
Dedicated to I-love-LAS-MMALM! After Sophia Rose had her nap, she woke up to find herself sitting in Luke's lap. Sophia: Oh! Hey, Luke. I was surprised to see myself sleeping on your lap. Luke: Me, too. Hey, since it's a beautiful day, why don't you let me take you for a ride in my car? Sophia: Good idea! Let's go! Sophia started to go out the door when Luke realized something. Luke: Uh, Sophia? Aren't you forgetting something? Sophia looked at her socked feet. Sophia: Oh! I forgot to get my shoes on! Luke: I'll start the car & when you're done, I'll be waiting for you. Sophia: Alright! Sophia got her shoes on & got in Luke's car. Luke: So, Sophia, where do you want to go? Sophia: Can we go to the mall? Luke: Sure! After 15 minutes, Sophia felt something strange going on in her body. Her bladder was nearly full & she was squirming in her seat too much. Sophia: Uh, Luke? Luke: What is it? Sophia: I... I... I need to use the bathroom. Luk
Mature content
Coffee, Tea, or Pee? Royal JordanianRerwin273Spider Gwen's gotta go!Rerwin375
Mature content
Another Pool Predicament - I-C.U.P. Art Pack FreebFrist44693
Saito's Desperation
Warning: This is a poop omorashi. If you're not into that, then don't read. Shizuru-Minamino10
I'm in my car with my fiance, Saito, in the passenger seat next to me, and our one-year-old, Tenshi, sitting in his carseat. He's babbling and talking very well to a little portable DVD player featuring 'Peppa Pig.' I look over at Saito and he has this tight expression on his face. He seems to be sitting rather uncomfortably. But he's pretending like he's fine and didn't say anything to me. 'Do you gotta go?' He sighs and nods a yes. 'I'm regretting the Ramen we ate for lunch.' I don't know how, because I know I'm not having bathroom problems. 'We just had Ramen. We did have stuff last night. That's what was taking me so long at the restaurant women's room. I remembered the Mexican tacos we had last night for supper. I had to crap them out. I know I shared part of mine with Tenshi, because he crapped his diaper. That's p
Mature content
When the laxatives worked in wrong timingConanRock123
Batman T.A.S.-Babydoll-'Still Love That Baby'3
However by the time they get back to the house, Babydoll is wide-awake again, and has decided to go for a swim, Mariams, I'm going to the pool, okay, but I'm going to come with you, alrights, Babydoll said, removing her thick wet diaper, and clothes, and changing into a swim diaper, before having Mariam help her into her pink one-piece swimsuit, alright let's go, Babydoll said, running to the elevator, Mariam then carries Babydoll, out of the elevator, and into the pool room. getsomeofitnow00Pompoms Pee DesperationBrooms172264Eve Holding ItBrooms172214
The room is mostly bluish grey, with a high vaulted rectangular baby and dark blue tile swimming pool in the center overlooked by a large rectangular skylight, and around the poolsides, a few plastic lounge chairs, Mariam sits down in the one nearest the steps, and Babydoll steps down the stairs, stops at the one closest to the water and dips her toes into the water, before stepping the rest of the way into the water, and proceeding to paddle all the way to the deep end of the pool, and back, over to the shallow e
Final Exam Part III, Grease, Marty Omorashi Fanfic
Final Exam Part III: getsomeofitnow00
She walked out into the hall towards the nurse's office to get a clean diaper, her messy diaper once again effecting the manner in which she walked, the smell now becoming extremely noticeable, as she walked, the worst thing possible at that moment happened, when she tried to walk faster, she tripped up over her own legs, and fell on her Messy bottom, ewww, she thought, standing up and quickly getting into the clinic, before she could utter a word, the school nurse, who was probably able to smell her, said, you messed your diaper, huh? Marty nodded her head, alright lie down her, and I'll get you another diaper, Marty did as instructed, and the nurse repeated the diapering process, okay, there you go, but please try not to mess yourself again, I really don't want to have to wash these. She walked from the clinic back into the hallway and to lunch, where to other pink ladies, (and sandy) were already there, and sat down, hey guess, she said, sitting down next
Mature content
The Walking Dead: Desperation Torture.ommaley44
Point Commission Info
Halfbody Detailed Coloring ( 300 Points) Sunshine-Sky77Coffee, Tea , or Pee? Ethiopia AirlinesRerwin161
Detailed coloring of half body (if you want a background you will have to pay 100 points extra and 300 points extra for second character and so on) Fullbody Detailed Coloring (520 Points)
Mature content
Coffee, Tea, or Pee? Cathay Pacific!Rerwin160StagesABAlex10910
Mature content
Potty Training Therapy Part 6
Soooooo I completely forgot I never finished this story. Sorry! There will be one more chapter after this. Omo9021060
As Sharon settled in the chair with Aidan, he snuggled into her side. A little while later, he was getting cold, so he pressed himself against her even more. 'I cold, Mommy,' he complained. 'Okay, sweetheart.' Sharon covered him with a blanket and held him a little more tightly in her arms. She'd noticed that he'd sounded a little congested since he woke up from his nap and hoped he was just coming down with a cold. His cheeks were a little flushed now, though, so she held the back of her hand to his forehead. 'Oh, sweetie, you're a little warm. I think you have a bit of a fever.' She put her hands on his cheeks and studied him closely. His eyes had the weak, 'sick' look to them that she was very familiar with at this point in her life. 'Does your throat still hurt?' Aidan nodded sadly. 'You sound like your nose feels yucky, too. I'll give you some medicine after dinne Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |